Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/System Professional/Repair Shampoo
Repair Shampoo
System Professional

Repair Shampoo

hair care250mlGTIN 4064666043371
Bio Therapy Shampoo

Cleaner pick · Safest cleansing we have rated

Africology Skincare & Spa

Bio Therapy Shampoo

+56 on ingredient safety

250ml · 47.50 ZAR · 19 ZAR/100 ml

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 8963 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

37OUT OF 100Horrible

range 29–58

44▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
30
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

54-point split

46

Scan

28

Precautionary

82

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

8963 found

See better →

Flagged

7 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 57-point gap between the two loudest voices.

28Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
85Health Canada Ingredient HotlistGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 8963 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

57 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: IARC Monographs · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens

✓Recognized on a safer-ingredients list: US EPA Safer Choice recognizes 50% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates System Professional as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Packaging

      We no longer show a score from this source for this product. We pulled the last one we held on Sep 10, 2026.

      Coverage & match quality

      6 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

      • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
      • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

      Weighted by what you care about

      Tune your weights

      composite recomputes live

      +
      1.0×
      Environmentalno rating

      No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

      1.0×
      Packagingno rating

      No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

      0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

      Ingredients, decoded

      Data availability

      Robust·15 of 16 characterized

      Our sources have reference data on 15 of 16 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

      Worth a look (7)

      • Methylparaben7/10preservative · fragranceraters disagree

        Endocrine-active · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

      • Propylparaben7/10preservative · perfumingraters disagree

        Endocrine-active · flagged by 4 of 9 lists →

      • Cocamidopropyl Betaine6/10common irritantantistatic · cleansing · hair conditioningraters disagree

        Strong contact sensitizer · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

      • Parfum6/10undeclared fragrance blendperfuming · fragranceraters disagree

        Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

      • Polyquaternium-74/10film forming · antistaticraters disagree

        EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

      • Citric Acid4/10fragrance · chelating · bufferingraters disagree

        Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

      • Sodium Hydroxide4/10buffering · denaturantraters disagree

        EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

      ✓No flags in our sources (8)

      • Aqua
      • Sodium Laureth Sulfate
      • PEG-3 Distearate
      • Sodium Chloride
      • Sodium Benzoate
      • Polyquaternium-10
      • Disodium EDTA
      • Cyclohexane

      No data in our sources (1)

      • Hydroxyisohexyl 3

      Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

      What these ingredient tags mean (2)

      These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

      • common irritantCocamidopropyl Betaine

        • Cocamidopropyl Betaine: A mild cleansing agent, but a recurring patch-test finding, usually traced to leftovers from how it is made. American Contact Dermatitis Society, Allergen of the Year 2004 (Fowler JF Jr, Dermatitis 2004;15(1):3-4).
      • undeclared fragrance blendParfum

        • Parfum: A blend the label does not itemize, so what is in it cannot be read from the ingredient list. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 permits the collective term "parfum"; the SCCS Opinion on Fragrance Allergens (SCCS/1459/11) reviews the contact-allergy evidence for the substances it can contain.

      Where this came from

      Cruelty-free status recorded from systemprofessional.com ↗

      Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.