Cleaner pick · Safest masks we have rated
bliss
Pro Microneedling Gel Mask+60 on ingredient safety
$40
Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Cleaner pick · Safest masks we have rated
bliss
Pro Microneedling Gel Mask+60 on ingredient safety
$40
Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.
Cleaner options
3363 found
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 72-point gap between the two loudest voices.
All 3363 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · IARC Monographs · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Garnier as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 11, 2026. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
6 ratings · 3 of 4 axes
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
How we know the packaging
Read from the product photo, not declared by the maker — treat this score as weaker.
The container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.
Data availability
Good28 of 33 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 28 of 33 listed ingredients; 5 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (5)
Endocrine-activeflagged by 3 of 9 lists →
Where this came from
Product identity (name, brand, category) verified against meds.se ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.
Endocrine-activeflagged by 4 of 9 lists →
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
No flags in our sources (23)
No data in our sources (5)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.
common irritantPROPYLENE GLYCOL
undeclared fragrance blendparfum
humectantGLYCERIN, sodium hyaluronate