Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Top Care/Everyday Maximum Strength With Fluoride Sensitive Anticavity Toothpaste for Sensitive Teeth, Fresh Mint, Fresh Mint
Everyday Maximum Strength With Fluoride Sensitive Anticavity Toothpaste for Sensitive Teeth, Fresh Mint, Fresh Mint (2018 formulation)
Top Care

Everyday Maximum Strength With Fluoride Sensitive Anticavity Toothpaste for Sensitive Teeth, Fresh Mint, Fresh Mint

2018 formulationOral Care
Natural Tooth Powder, Cinnamon

Cleaner pick · Safest oral care we have rated

BEE-OCH Organics

Natural Tooth Powder, Cinnamon

+45 on ingredient safety

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 870 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

55OUT OF 100Fair

Ingredient safety only

range 42–85

55▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

40-point split

46

Scan

42

Precautionary

82

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

870 found

See better →

Flagged

5 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 43-point gap between the two loudest voices.

42Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
85Health Canada Ingredient HotlistGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 870 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

43 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)

✓Recognized on a safer-ingredients list: US EPA Safer Choice recognizes 57% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    6 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·14 of 14 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on all 14 listed ingredients.

    Worth a look (5)

    • TITANIUM DIOXIDE8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists →

    • FLAVOR6/10flavouring agent · fragrance ingredientraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • Sodium Fluoride 0.244/10raters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

    • FD&C BLUE #14/10raters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • SODIUM LAURYL SULFATE4/10common irritantcleansing · denaturant · foamingraters disagree

      Transparency concern · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (9)

    • Potassium Nitrate 5.0
    • D&C YELLOW #10
    • GLYCERINhumectant
    • HYDRATED SILICA
    • SODIUM SACCHARIN
    • SORBITOL
    • TRISODIUM PHOSPHATE
    • WATER
    • XANTHAN GUM
    What these ingredient tags mean (2)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • common irritantSODIUM LAURYL SULFATE

      • SODIUM LAURYL SULFATE: A strong cleansing agent used as the reference irritant in skin-irritation testing. OECD Test Guideline 439 (in vitro skin irritation, reconstructed human epidermis), paragraph 24: "The suggested PC is 5% aqueous SDS", sodium dodecyl sulphate, the same substance as sodium lauryl sulfate, CAS 151-21-3.
    • humectantGLYCERIN

      • GLYCERIN: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".