Magic Light Fresh Scent Regular Strength Razorless Cream Shave (2020 formulation) safety rating

Magic Light Fresh Scent Regular Strength Razorless Cream Shave (2020 formulation) safety rating | Greenlens

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 43-point gap between the two loudest voices.

42Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent

85Health Canada Ingredient HotlistGovernment

050100

Every rater, every axis

43 pts apart

Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Recognized on a safer-ingredients list: US EPA Safer Choice recognizes 67% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.

Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates SoftSheen-Carson as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

5 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

Ingredient safety1.0×

Environmentalno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

Labor1.0×

Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Data availability

Robust11 of 12 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 11 of 12 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (4)

FRAGRANCEundeclared fragrance blendperfumingraters disagree
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
THIOGLYCOLIC ACID

No flags in our sources (7)

No data in our sources (1)

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

What these ingredient tags mean (2)

These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

common irritantPROPYLENE GLYCOL
- PROPYLENE GLYCOL: A solvent that shows up in patch-test clinics, more often as irritation than as allergy. American Contact Dermatitis Society, Allergen of the Year 2018 (Jacob SE, Scheman A, McGowan MA, Dermatitis 2018;29(1):3-5).
undeclared fragrance blendFRAGRANCE
- FRAGRANCE: A blend the label does not itemize, so what is in it cannot be read from the ingredient list. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 permits the collective term "parfum"; the SCCS Opinion on Fragrance Allergens (SCCS/1459/11) reviews the contact-allergy evidence for the substances it can contain.

Where this came from

Cruelty-free status recorded from peta.org ↗

Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.