Eyeshadow, Fire Orange safety rating

Eyeshadow, Fire Orange safety rating | Greenlens

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 28-point gap between the two loudest voices.

65ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment

93Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent

050100

All 6820 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

28 pts apart

Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

Coverage & match quality

5 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

Ingredient safety1.0×

Environmentalno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

Laborno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Data availability

Robust25 of 26 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 25 of 26 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (4)