MDSolarSciences
KidStick, SPF 40
Babytypically $30–70
Cleaner pick · Safest sun we have rated
Babo Botanicals
Sensitive Baby Mineral Sunscreen Stick SPF50+25 on ingredient safety
$14.50
Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 30-point gap between the two loudest voices.
65ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs95Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientAll 89 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
30 pts apartA government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)
Environmental
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Labor
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates MDSolarSciences as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
7 ratings · 3 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust21 of 21 characterized
Our sources have reference data on all 21 listed ingredients.
Worth a look (2)
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 5 of 9 lists →
EU microplastics-restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
No flags in our sources (19)
- Zinc Oxidesoothing
- Dimethiconerich occlusive
- Butyloctyl Salicylate
- Petrolatumrich occlusive
- Butyrospermum Parkii Butter
- C12-15 Alkyl Benzoate
- Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride
- Methyl Dihydroabietate
- Acrylates/Ethylhexyl Acrylate/Dimethicone Methacrylate Copolymer
- Octyldodecanol
- Tetrahexyldecyl Ascorbate
- Tocopherol
- Behenyl Olivate
- Aluminum Hydroxide
- Stearic Acid
- Sorbitan Sesquioleate
- Glyceryl Isostearate
- Polyhydroxystearic Acid
- Benzylidene Dimethoxydimethylindanone
What these ingredient tags mean (2)
These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.
rich occlusiveDimethicone, Petrolatum
- Dimethicone: A silicone that forms a film on the surface of the skin without an oily feel. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(g), lists dimethicone as a skin protectant at 1 to 30%.
- Petrolatum: A barrier that sits on the surface of the skin, which is also why it feels heavy. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(m) and (r), lists petrolatum and white petrolatum as skin protectants at 30 to 100%.
soothingZinc Oxide
- Zinc Oxide: A mineral UV filter that the FDA also recognises as a skin protectant. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(u), lists zinc oxide as a skin-protectant active at 1 to 25%. Its labelled indication is 21 CFR 347.50(b)(3), "dries the oozing and weeping of poison: ivy, oak, sumac". The monograph does not give it the "minor skin irritation and itching" wording.
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from leapingbunny.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.