Biodegradable Glitter, Gold

Glitter

Cleaner pick · Safest glitter we have rated

Holograve Cosmetics

Grave Dust Glitter, Ethereal

+14 on ingredient safety

Ingredient safetyRaters agree

Find on Amazon

See all 25 cleaner options

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Cleaner options

25 found

See better →

Flagged

2 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 20-point gap between the two loudest voices.

80Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent

vs

100Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent

050100

See why, ingredient by ingredient

All 25 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

20 pts apart

Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · IARC Monographs · California Proposition 65 · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist

Environmental

Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

Coverage & match quality

3 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+

Ingredient safety1.0×

Environmentalno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

Laborno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Good5 of 7 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 5 of 7 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (2)

FD&C Yellow #5raters disagree
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
D&C Red #7raters disagree

No flags in our sources (3)

No data in our sources (2)

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

What these ingredient tags mean (1)

These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

humectantglycerin
- glycerin: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".

EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →