Schmidt's
Deodorant Charcoal + Magnesium
Deodorant
Cleaner pick · Safest deodorant we have rated
Primally Pure
Geranium Deodorant+45 on ingredient safety
$16
Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Cleaner pick · Safest deodorant we have rated
Primally Pure
Geranium Deodorant+45 on ingredient safety
$16
Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.
Cleaner options
1542 found
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 58-point gap between the two loudest voices.
All 1542 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · California Proposition 65 · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · IARC Monographs
Recognized on a safer-ingredients list: US EPA Safer Choice recognizes 55% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Schmidt's as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
4 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Data availability
Good9 of 11 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 9 of 11 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (1)
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
No flags in our sources (8)
No data in our sources (2)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.