e.l.f. Cosmetics, Inc.
e.l.f. Cosmetics 16 Hr Camo Concealer, Light Sand
Concealer
Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated
Tarte
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick+22 on ingredient safety
$38
Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated
Tarte
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick+22 on ingredient safety
$38
Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.
Cleaner options
2105 found
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 32-point gap between the two loudest voices.
All 2105 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · IARC Monographs · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates e.l.f. Cosmetics, Inc. as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
6 ratings · 3 of 4 axes
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Data availability
Robust21 of 22 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 21 of 22 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (2)
Persistent / bioaccumulativeflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from leapingbunny.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.
EU microplastics-restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
No flags in our sources (19)
No data in our sources (1)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.
rich occlusiveDIMETHICONE