Eyeshadow, Black Out (2020 formulation) safety rating

Eyeshadow, Black Out (2020 formulation) safety rating | Greenlens

All 543 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

raters agree

Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Klarity Kosmetics as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

5 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+

Ingredient safety1.0×

Environmental1.0×

Labor1.0×

Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Data availability

Good8 of 10 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 8 of 10 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (2)

Nylon 12opacifying · bulking · viscosity controllingraters disagree
EU microplastics-restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
Phenoxyethanolpreservative · antimicrobial

No flags in our sources (6)

No data in our sources (2)

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

What these ingredient tags mean (1)

These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

comedogenic in testingIsopropyl Myristate
- Isopropyl Myristate: A light emollient, and the ester the rabbit-ear literature names first. Fulton JE Jr, Pay SR, Fulton JE 3rd, "Comedogenicity of current therapeutic products, cosmetics, and ingredients in the rabbit ear", J Am Acad Dermatol 1984;10(1):96-105, PMID 6229554. The openly readable abstract names this ingredient among its "ingredient offenders", in prose and without a numeric rating: "Ingredient offenders include isopropyl myristate and its analogs, such as isopropyl palmitate, isopropyl isostearate, butyl stearate, isostearyl neopentanoate, myristyl myristate..." The rabbit-ear assay rates raw ingredients and does not predict how a finished formula behaves on human skin.

Where this came from

Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.