Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Dove/2 in 1 Anti Dandruff Shampoo & Conditioner
2 in 1 Anti Dandruff Shampoo & Conditioner
Dove · owned by Unilever

2 in 1 Anti Dandruff Shampoo & Conditioner

Conditioner
Shampoo/Body Wash, Ginger-Orange (2019 formulation)

Cleaner pick · Safest multi-function cleansing we have rated

Healing-Scents

Shampoo/Body Wash, Ginger-Orange2019 formulation

+44 on ingredient safety

$12–30

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 270 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

73OUT OF 100Good

range 62–89

56▲▼ split
Safety
90
Eco
72▲▼ split
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

46-point split

62

Scan

42

Precautionary

88

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

270 found

See better →

Flagged

9 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 46-point gap between the two loudest voices.

42Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
88Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 270 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

46 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: US NTP Report on Carcinogens · California Proposition 65 · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

✓Recognized on a safer-ingredients list: US EPA Safer Choice recognizes 58% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Labor

33 pts apart
  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Dove as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

9 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·19 of 19 characterized

Our sources have reference data on all 19 listed ingredients.

Worth a look (9)

  • Pyrithione Zinc 1.08/10raters disagree

    EU harmonised CMR (cat. 1) · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • COCAMIDOPROPYL BETAINE6/10common irritantantistatic · cleansing · hair conditioningraters disagree

    Strong contact sensitizer · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • FRAGRANCE6/10undeclared fragrance blendperfumingraters disagree

    Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • CARBOMER4/10emulsion stabilising · gel forming · viscosity controllingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • CITRIC ACID4/10fragrance · chelating · bufferingraters disagree

    Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • PHENOXYETHANOL4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

    Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • ZINC SULFATE4/10antimicrobial · antiplaque · astringentraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • TEA-DODECYLBENZENESULFONATE4/10cleansing · foaming · surfactant - cleansingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • ALOE BARBADENSIS LEAF JUICE4/10skin conditioningraters disagree

    IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B) · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

✓No flags in our sources (10)

  • WATER
  • SODIUM LAURETH SULFATE
  • SODIUM CHLORIDE
  • DIMETHICONOL
  • SODIUM BENZOATE
  • SODIUM SALICYLATE
  • PPG-9
  • GUAR HYDROXYPROPYLTRIMONIUM CHLORIDE
  • COCOS NUCIFERA OIL
  • BUTYROSPERMUM PARKII BUTTER
What these ingredient tags mean (2)

These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

  • common irritantCOCAMIDOPROPYL BETAINE

    • COCAMIDOPROPYL BETAINE: A mild cleansing agent, but a recurring patch-test finding, usually traced to leftovers from how it is made. American Contact Dermatitis Society, Allergen of the Year 2004 (Fowler JF Jr, Dermatitis 2004;15(1):3-4).
  • undeclared fragrance blendFRAGRANCE

    • FRAGRANCE: A blend the label does not itemize, so what is in it cannot be read from the ingredient list. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 permits the collective term "parfum"; the SCCS Opinion on Fragrance Allergens (SCCS/1459/11) reviews the contact-allergy evidence for the substances it can contain.