Cosmetics Eye Sparkler Sparkling Eye Topper, Glimmer safety rating

Cosmetics Eye Sparkler Sparkling Eye Topper, Glimmer safety rating | Greenlens

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 29-point gap between the two loudest voices.

65ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment

vs

94Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent

050100

All 2679 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

29 pts apart

Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Profusion as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

7 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+

Ingredient safety1.0×

Environmental1.0×

Labor1.0×

Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Data availability

Robust13 of 15 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 13 of 15 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (3)

TITANIUM DIOXIDEuv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 5 of 9 lists →
CARBOMER

No flags in our sources (10)

No data in our sources (2)

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

What these ingredient tags mean (2)

These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

common irritantPROPYLENE GLYCOL
- PROPYLENE GLYCOL: A solvent that shows up in patch-test clinics, more often as irritation than as allergy. American Contact Dermatitis Society, Allergen of the Year 2018 (Jacob SE, Scheman A, McGowan MA, Dermatitis 2018;29(1):3-5).
humectantGLYCERIN
- GLYCERIN: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".

Where this came from

Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.