Ingredient profile
At least one of our safety lists speaks to this ingredient. Also written as CYCLOTETRASILOXANE, cyclotetrasiloxane.
Raters don't agree. Here's where each one stands
—
EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)
Government
Greenlens Ingredient Scan
Independent
Greenlens Precautionary Screen
Independent
Greenlens Tolerance Screen
Independent
ANSES Endocrine Disruptors
Government
Greenlens Ingredient Scan
Independent
Listed in Annex II of the EU Cosmetics Regulation (ref 1388) — prohibited as an ingredient in cosmetic products. (EU Cosmetics Regulation Annex II (prohibited))
Greenlens Precautionary Screen
Independent
A silicone classified as an endocrine disruptor and reproductive toxicant in the EU. (EU CLP Annex VI (CMR classification); ChemSec SIN List (Substitute It Now))
Also screened — not on these lists
Each jurisdiction is reported on its own terms, from its own official lists. Where they disagree, that disagreement is the finding. Absence from a list is never a safety claim.
Prohibited as a cosmetic ingredient in this jurisdiction.
Greenlens Tolerance Screen
Independent
Listed in Annex II of the EU Cosmetics Regulation (ref 1388) — prohibited as an ingredient in cosmetic products. (EU Cosmetics Regulation Annex II (prohibited))
ANSES Endocrine Disruptors
Government
An ANSES endocrine-disruptor candidate (SNPE2); the silicone D4 is classified Repr. 2 and prohibited in cosmetics. (ANSES — French national strategy on endocrine disruptors (SNPE2))
EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)
Government
Carries an EU harmonised classification (Repr. 2) — a suspected (category 2) carcinogen, mutagen or reproductive toxicant under CLP Annex VI, index 014-018-00-1. A hazard classification, not proof of harm at the level used. (EU CLP Regulation Annex VI, Table 3 (harmonised classification, ECHA export))
Not on the lists we hold for this jurisdiction. That is an absence of a listing, not a safety finding.
Checked: Health Canada Cosmetic Ingredient Hotlist.
Not on the lists we hold for this jurisdiction. That is an absence of a listing, not a safety finding.
Checked: OEHHA Proposition 65 list.
Not on the lists we hold for this jurisdiction. That is an absence of a listing, not a safety finding.
Checked: NTP Report on Carcinogens; EPA Safer Chemical Ingredients List.