Ingredient profile
At least one of our safety lists speaks to this ingredient. Also written as Bht, bht, bHt.
Raters don't agree. Here's where each one stands
Greenlens Tolerance Screen
Independent
Greenlens Ingredient Scan
Independent
ANSES Endocrine Disruptors
Government
Greenlens Precautionary Screen
Independent
Greenlens Ingredient Scan
Independent
Synthetic antioxidants with endocrine-disruption questions at higher exposures. (Common transparency/sensitization concern (not a regulatory ban))
Greenlens Precautionary Screen
Independent
A synthetic antioxidant with endocrine-activity questions at higher exposures. (ChemSec SIN List (Substitute It Now))
Also screened — not on these lists
Each jurisdiction is reported on its own terms, from its own official lists. Where they disagree, that disagreement is the finding. Absence from a list is never a safety claim.
Not on the lists we hold for this jurisdiction. That is an absence of a listing, not a safety finding.
Checked: EU Cosmetics Regulation Annexes II, III, V and VI; CLP Annex VI harmonised classification; ECHA SVHC Candidate List (cosmetics-relevant subset).
Not on the lists we hold for this jurisdiction. That is an absence of a listing, not a safety finding.
Checked: Health Canada Cosmetic Ingredient Hotlist.
Not on the lists we hold for this jurisdiction. That is an absence of a listing, not a safety finding.
Checked: OEHHA Proposition 65 list.
Greenlens Tolerance Screen
Independent
Permitted and used within typical limits, so this lens tolerates it. (Common transparency/sensitization concern (not a regulatory ban))
ANSES Endocrine Disruptors
Government
An ANSES endocrine-disruptor candidate (SNPE2); a common antioxidant flagged for endocrine activity. (ANSES — French national strategy on endocrine disruptors (SNPE2))
Not on the lists we hold for this jurisdiction. That is an absence of a listing, not a safety finding.
Checked: NTP Report on Carcinogens; EPA Safer Chemical Ingredients List.
